Sorry Record or Skinning the Cat in Other Ways?

The attack left wing print media's bad-boy posterchild for oppressive activity today launches a post 60th birthday assault on the first couple. Why today's Bush bash? The Times' editors tell us that Bush is fibbing when he tells us that his enviro-record is "great."

Why is Bush not actually helping the environment? Because the NY Times' left wing extremists say he hasn't used their long menu of oppressive and unconstitutional means to stop the people from doing what they want to do; going where they want to go; live the way they choose to live; and pay competitive prices for what they want to buy.

The truth is that 6 years of Bush environment policy has resulted in pollution reductions that near twice the Europeans. All this by encouraging business to improve their use of power and to reduce the resulting pollution. Fact is that America leads the world (by far) in energy use efficiency and energy use productivity. While our economy increases by 4% or more, our population swells by several million every year, our energy use declines.

From my viewpoint it's not the environment. It's the end of secular socialism that sends the Times' far lefties into deep frustration, illegal behavior, and desperation. I encourage all to voice their agreement to regulating the print media and regulating all media in the last 60 days of all elections. These regulations should be criminally enforced, as these same liberals seek to criminalize those with other political opinions.

Who will do the perp walk?



.

Congress to the Rescue!!

Congress moves to increase domestic fossil fuel exploration and production. When connected to recent refining encouragements, domestic production and refining will increase dramatically. More importantly is that a three decade assault on fossil fuel production and usage might be at an end.

The initial attacks on petroleum usage were rightly due to its large scale pollution. Today, little pollution is emitted from cars, trucks, and aircraft. There is no consensus that CO2 emissions are pollution harmful to humans and the planet. In fact many say that increased levels of CO2 actually strengthens plants because carbon dioxide is plants' primary food.

Why is there quick movement to encourage exploration and production? It's off year election time. The people can see clearly which party supports environmentally safe production and which party wants to end all fossil fuel usage. Maybe annual elections will expedite legislative activity.