Psychosis On Display

A treasure trove of Supreme Court opinions shines the stark light of day on elitist secular progressive thinking and acting. First example is liberal thinking when the constitution or legal precedents don't support their feelings? Not to worry, use other's values and morals to guide and justify creating (unconsitutional) judicial laws. In the infamous Roper vs. Simmons, The liberal Supremes told us that Europeans don't execute the under-aged (they of course don't execute the over-aged either) and that American "public opinion" now favors ending this form of capital punishment. The implication is that Europe is modern and US citizens are at last catching up.

The problem with this opinion isn't just that it relies on European sentiments and unnamed US public opinion polls, it also is disconnected from European and world behavior. The French kill children indiscriminately when it's convenient or even reasonable. They recently shot over a dozen children during a "peaceful" march in the Ivory Coast that murdered over 150. Why? Several French colonialist felt endangered even though the Ivory Coast is an independent UN recognized member country. Worse, the French abuse Muslims living in France without due process and even debate whether rioting Muslim children should be shot on sight or hanged for terrorism only after due process. Now this is European justice!

Worse is the Mass. vs EPA regal ruling. Here the far left progressives decided that American process doesn't count when it's a pet project of the lefties they worship. The Bush administration argued that the EPA can't control C02, carbon dioxide, which is the building block of life and is the most critical food of plants and is the only way oxygen is created, because it's not proven to be a pollutant.

Not to worry, say the blathering bumblers! Let's just use the new product process where a new product must be proven safe before it can be introduced to the market place. So without a wink and a sigh, the lesser Supremes said that the EPA: "must regulate C02 unless it proves that it isn't a pollutant."

Better than the infamous EPA ruling is the most recent Left Wing Tripe Award Winner, in Gonzales v. Carhart, the loosing Supremes didn't find that partial birth abortion is needed or even legal, they just said that: "restricting this particular procedure is a purely political slippery slope" to further restrictions to legal abortion. Breathtaking law analysis. True progressive thought!!! Imagine that four political extremists actually answered honestly that their legal opinion is based on political feelings and far left paranoid sentiments, not the law or the constitution!!!!!! Even Europe, often the Garden of Eden for lefties, regulates every abortion procedure with both the mother and the baby receiving respect. But what do they know? Ask Johnny Kerry, who is America's resident Frenchie!

Further court psychosis is represented in a recent Washington State Supreme Court ruling. In "Everybody gay vs. Washington," the court stammered and fumbled but finally said that legislatures have a right to regulate most everything, including marriage. While court members cringed, they had to say that the people's representatives can legislate and regulate. Seems to me that these lefties were hounded by the act that Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMA) and resolutions and referendum ARE the cornerstone of democracy, especially when DOMAs all over the country have received in direct voting over 70% super majority support by the people. Yet the extremists attempted to encourage other means of overturning Washington's DOMA.