Monkey See, Monkey Do!

The first hysterical tsunami has passed. Now the Chinese drip drip drip torture follows. That's because "progressive" and "Communist" and "Fascist" are interchangeable words as well as like cultures. I recently saw a TV commercial by a wind farm group telling us that if we don't act now we will all be dead by 2050. They say acting means building more windmills. AARP's and enviro-radicals' commercials use children to ask why we are killing them? But what about the results? The answer is Clinton's "Don't ask and Don't tell and Al Gore's version of: "Are you going to believe your eyes or my words?"!

There are very curious similarities between the Bush war on terror and the progressive war on climate change. Bush believed then and today that Saddam Hussein was directly connected to world terrorism even though it seemed a no-brainer while real evidence was scarce. Progressives believe that global warming is caused by carbon dioxide even though there isn't a shred of evidence connecting the two. Some experts believe the opposite. They say that more carbon in the atmosphere leads to cooling.

The difference is that Bush seeks to curb hate based murderers while progressives seek to use global warming to oppress the world's people. What troubles me is that progressives seem so intellectually bankrupt that they have copy what they say they hate about their political enemies. It took America 40 years to respond to Muslim attacks while we are more than 30 years from the first eco-oppressor attacks. So maybe we should declare war on eco-Fascists as well as other oppressors. Seems that climate psychosis needs some very serious meds.

50 Years and That's All.

Fifty years and counting. That's what commercials from the Wind Industry are telling us. They say we have fifty years left until the end. Problem is they are conservative in their psychotic rants compared to "Sock-Puppet-Al" who is handled by far left wing atheists and mankind haters. Al says that we have about a decade "before it all tips."

So those of us that survived the duck and cover days of nuclear attacks now need to kiss our sweet ass good bye due to global warming that some say will increase by a degree or two over the next decade or three. Just to be smart about all this, I bought a couple Korean air conditioners at COSTCO. So I say: "Bring it On," I've got my back covered.

Truth is that there isn't a single thread of evidence that carbon dioxide causes warmth or cold. The same dildos that called for a huge global cooling only 30 years ago now call for a huge global warming. I'm a sun addict, so bring on the warming. I've never used more than a 5 rated sunscreen so maybe I should jack it up to 15 or so. Those more hysterical say we should start at 50.

Reality for me is that Martians are screeching at us about global warming and Demons from Hell are telling us about the solutions to their contrived earth ending dangers. The Martians are so-called scientists that believe that the earth has too many humans and that human activity causes all the earth's ills. They have zero-squat-Nada evidence but they feel and know they are right. The Demons are left wing radicals that hate humans but hate private enterprise and profit more. So we have the Martian haters along with the human and business haters combined to blow hot air into the Al-Gore-Sock-Puppet. Go Girl Al!

This week, Michael Griffin, NASA Administrator, told PBS that it's arrogant for some to demand they know what earth temperatures and CO2 content in the atmosphere are best of some or even all human beings and/or animals and/or plants. And then the tsunami of hate overwhelmed Griffin. In fact, James Hanson, Al Gore's handler, sock puppeteer, and another NASA scientist, mercilessly attacked Griffin by "epiphanizing" that millions would suffer from his ignorance.

Waaaaaa! Millions are dead or are suffering from Billybob Clinton's and Al Gore's and/or Jimmy Carter's ignorances and stupidities. But go figure!

Neo-Slavers are Talking

These are heady times for neo-slavers that believe a new threshold of power to impose international secular progressive socialism is now within grasp. The "Old" world is embracing global warming because they feel that others use too much and have more than they need. Others? Yes the rabble. Remember the rabble that is unmanageable. The rabble that always demands more than they need. Oh, that rabble. Most every man, woman, and child in America, as well as the rest of the world.

The people are a liability to elitists. Just watch the neo-slaver's "Bible," called the "Matrix." Billybob, Hillarybob, and Al loved it. Because they identify with the "programmer" that has failed again and again to erase human beings because they display self determination and individual behavior. While mass murderers and tyrants and despots can get a half dozen years in a cable and spa filled prison, the people must be eradicated because they often think for themselves. If ever there is a reason for using weapons of mass destruction, the people are it.

Mark Thursday, May 3rd, 2007, on your calendar. It's the day a select group of secular progressive radicals will meet at the University of Washington to frame moral and ethical policies for the multi-trillion dollar global warming religion. The "Ethics and Climate Change" clambake tells us that: "it will focus on topics such as the ethical responsibilities of scientists, obligations to future generations, and the intersection between climate change, global justice and human rights." Global justice and human rights? That's neo-slaver speak for: some use more and have more than they need. So what to do? Robin Hood got it right, they say. Steal from those that have more and give it to those that have less. Global justice and human rights are served.

So what's the problem? Duh! This is a conference of secular socialist elitists tauting global warming to rule the world. Never has a single event in human development been more comprehensive and powerful to herd the rabble. The problem is that the majority of the world's people believe in individual rights and self determination. They believe in God and seek access to America's beacon of freedoms. The people want things they don't need, say the secular progressive neo-slavers. So lets just tell them what they need and provide about 60% of it so they don't get too uppity.

Seems elitists promote the mission statements of America's government institutions. Highways? If you build more, people just drive more. Fossil fuels? If we drill and produce more, the people just abuse energy by wasting it on things they don't need. Pharmaceuticals and medical care? If the people decide, they will demand care that they don't need. Housing? We must block construction and sprawl because people demand houses they don't need. No wonder the Matrix programmer laments that he continues to fail at eradicating the Matrix of human beings.

And so will the undemocratic chit-chatters at the University of Washington. They care not for diversity or democracy. They are on a mission to enslave, err to provide for mankind. Morally and ethicall, of course!!!!!

Conservation is a Conservative Value

It's no coincidence that conservative and conservation share a root word. Conservative values and ethics demand that all respect nature while sharing this planet with plants and animals alike. History tells us that most conservation is achieved by the private sector employing competitive means to improve efficiency and to reduce cost. Not so for liberals and their especially hysterical progressive co-conspirators. Secular socialists, greens, and communists twist and abuse environmental issues as hammers to impose their radical political agenda. This is the political agenda that was politically, economically, militarily, and morally defeated worldwide.

The problem for the moderate conservative is that radical eco-extorters are so extreme and dishonest that the knee-jerk reaction to this oppressive agenda is to oppose it. And that's how radicals can then label conservatives as anti-environment. Of course the media can take an encore because it's their misrepresentations and outright lies that keep the people believing that conservatives hate the environment, the average guy, the poor, and the needy. That's about as honest as sexual predator Billy Clinton wagging his finger about "that woman."

Conservation is now the major world topic. So conservative voices are again calling for conservative solutions to liberal hysteria. Why? Because if left unchecked, liberals will destroy the world. Newt Gingrich recently wrote in Human Events.com that: "The time has come to define a fundamentally different approach to a healthy environment and a healthy economy. The time has come for the development of Green Conservatism as an alternative to big bureaucracy and big litigation liberal environmentalism." Don't forget elitist subjugation, Newt!!!

Every conservative I know cares about the environment. None I know attempt to use the environment to oppress others. True conservatives feel that every day freedoms must be supported with a large variety of diverse choices that allow the individual to make moral, ethical, and values based behavior decisions. The fewer the choices, the smaller the diversity of decisions. So a one size fits all Marxist solution to complex environmental challenges is doomed to the same abject failure as Marxist politics. The people reject someone like Al Gore, a fat, lazy, intellectually challenged, and dishonest person, demanding that they walk so that he can ride on a jet. They reject the likes John Kerry and Barbra Streisand demanding that we reduce our "carbon footprint" so they can make "footprints"a thousand times larger than an average person.

Proof again is that energy efficiency has increased and greenhouse gas emissions have moderated more under President Bush than any world leader in any country of the world at any time of human history. Why? Because this president uses incentives and rewards for clean and efficient behavior while all others use oppressive laws and penalties and even the threat of criminal prosecution. Incentives and rewards in a competitive environment achieve results never achieved by coercion and threats. So, as with all other human and natural challenges, competition with incentives and rewards for successful improvements and increased eficiencies is the only way to balance man's needs with nature's ability to support them. That's the conservative way and it's the only way to real conservation.

Only Judeo-Christian ideals of personal responsibility and self determination can build a healthy economy supported by a healthy planet. Tell me about one elitist liberal that can improve on this 2,000 plus years old concept?

Psychosis On Display

A treasure trove of Supreme Court opinions shines the stark light of day on elitist secular progressive thinking and acting. First example is liberal thinking when the constitution or legal precedents don't support their feelings? Not to worry, use other's values and morals to guide and justify creating (unconsitutional) judicial laws. In the infamous Roper vs. Simmons, The liberal Supremes told us that Europeans don't execute the under-aged (they of course don't execute the over-aged either) and that American "public opinion" now favors ending this form of capital punishment. The implication is that Europe is modern and US citizens are at last catching up.

The problem with this opinion isn't just that it relies on European sentiments and unnamed US public opinion polls, it also is disconnected from European and world behavior. The French kill children indiscriminately when it's convenient or even reasonable. They recently shot over a dozen children during a "peaceful" march in the Ivory Coast that murdered over 150. Why? Several French colonialist felt endangered even though the Ivory Coast is an independent UN recognized member country. Worse, the French abuse Muslims living in France without due process and even debate whether rioting Muslim children should be shot on sight or hanged for terrorism only after due process. Now this is European justice!

Worse is the Mass. vs EPA regal ruling. Here the far left progressives decided that American process doesn't count when it's a pet project of the lefties they worship. The Bush administration argued that the EPA can't control C02, carbon dioxide, which is the building block of life and is the most critical food of plants and is the only way oxygen is created, because it's not proven to be a pollutant.

Not to worry, say the blathering bumblers! Let's just use the new product process where a new product must be proven safe before it can be introduced to the market place. So without a wink and a sigh, the lesser Supremes said that the EPA: "must regulate C02 unless it proves that it isn't a pollutant."

Better than the infamous EPA ruling is the most recent Left Wing Tripe Award Winner, in Gonzales v. Carhart, the loosing Supremes didn't find that partial birth abortion is needed or even legal, they just said that: "restricting this particular procedure is a purely political slippery slope" to further restrictions to legal abortion. Breathtaking law analysis. True progressive thought!!! Imagine that four political extremists actually answered honestly that their legal opinion is based on political feelings and far left paranoid sentiments, not the law or the constitution!!!!!! Even Europe, often the Garden of Eden for lefties, regulates every abortion procedure with both the mother and the baby receiving respect. But what do they know? Ask Johnny Kerry, who is America's resident Frenchie!

Further court psychosis is represented in a recent Washington State Supreme Court ruling. In "Everybody gay vs. Washington," the court stammered and fumbled but finally said that legislatures have a right to regulate most everything, including marriage. While court members cringed, they had to say that the people's representatives can legislate and regulate. Seems to me that these lefties were hounded by the act that Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMA) and resolutions and referendum ARE the cornerstone of democracy, especially when DOMAs all over the country have received in direct voting over 70% super majority support by the people. Yet the extremists attempted to encourage other means of overturning Washington's DOMA.

Blah, Blah, Blah!!

One wonderful example of the global warming religion's propaganda is the "anecdotal docu-drama." This story line is used to gain "political consensus" where no scientific evidence supports climate alarmists. The NY Times prints one of these on April 11th. It's headlined: "Seas Rise causes...." This meandering story is written by By Somini Sengupta, an Indian journalist.

Sengupta talks with residents of the Ganges River Delta as the river meets with the volatile Bay of Bengal of the Indian Ocean. This delta is one of the world's most dynamic environments with regular typhoons and floods and the world's most extreme Monsoon climate. We've all learned a little about the Mississippi Delta on which New Orleans is built and where New Orleans unrelentingly sinks into the marsh. Deltas are dynamic by definition. They flood and islands grow and break apart with predictability. Science tells us that there is no delta more in motion than the Ganges River Delta.

So what does global warming disciple Sengupta tell us? That the islands of the outer Ganges River Delta are exposed to tides, typhoons, and river flooding every year. Duh! This might be a question for "Are You Smarter Than A Third Grader" on FOX. But among the global warming followers, truth and science are but facts that others use to try to discredit their God.

The Big Lie of this article is that while the headline says "Rising Sea," there is not a single article mention of a rising sea level. Why? Because there is not a single scientific fact that supports the assertion that the Bay of Bengal's mean sea level is rising. In fact, some say that the sea is actually a little lower today than 100 years ago. But then actual sea level isn't important in this article. It's the feeling and the perception of a stronger and more volatile sea that is important and that this is caused by man-made pollution. Propaganda like this still underscores a Newt Gingrich quote from 1994 after American voters swept corrupt Democrats out of the House and Senate: "We will no longer legislate feel good and happiness and self worth." Worse is that we may now be legislating " global warming religious consensus."

Silence is Deafening!

Global warming religion's silence since this week's US Supremes fractured finding in Mass vs. EPA is deafening. Seems to me that some are digesting this finding's ultra-progressive left wing view, while others wonder if this position is short-lived because it's not based on law or on common sense. In fact the imperial Supremes, four individuals that care not for the constitution or the people, have again decided they can do as they feel because "they can." This is the European judicial view that has crept into our Supremes over the past 50 years time.

A recent similar crowing glory came in Roper vs. Simmons, where the same loony suspects decided that underage executions are unconstitutional. Why? Because they said with a straight face that European laws and public sentiment demanded it. They didn't base that finding on a single law or even on the US Constitution. They just said it's time to move on. They also ignored the fact that states regulate minor age executions more than any other criminal punishment. They ignore that the feds have no right to tell a state how to punish a criminal unless the punishment is cleary unconstitutional.

These Supremes are no less criminal in their views than earth's most desperate despots and tyrants. There are few greater single dangers to America than four make-believe tinpot jurists feeling they are above the law. If ever a group needs to be dragged into the pubic square to be exposed for their fraudulent and abusive behavior, these are the ones. Elitist Justice John Paul Stevens will take his place among the court's most illustrious double talkers. A place of Supreme Court infamy that counts racists, America haters, KKK members, communist worshipers, and power abusers among its membership. Worst is they are the foundation for future oppressions that will evolve America from a land of hope and opportunity to a racist, anti-capitalism, and atheist wasteland of John Kerryeske and Billybob/Hillarybob Clintonian liars and cheats oppressing the people.

Al Speaks or is it Wags His Finger?

Big Al Gore came to the "Hill" and the Hill embraced his words, except for a couple Republicans that pointed to Al's less-than-scientific and overly "shrill," in his words, message. Al, according to the N Y Times article "Warned Congress of Planetary Emergency." That's more danger and worse results than thermonuclear war, Al says. Yet when it came to details, Al skated better than Oregon's Tonya Harding. And like Tanya, Al's supporters used a club on the knees of anyone asking Al for answers to Al's claims and personal behavior.

Envirowars' award for plain speaking goes to Senator Inhofe (R) Oklahoma. Inhofe is on record questioning global warming and its secular socialist religious zealots, including Big Al.

Inhofe asked Al to justify his connecting 2005 hurricanes to global warming when hurricane experts say otherwise? Al (Tonya Harding) Gore skated with flair.

Inhofe asked Big Al to explain why the worst case scenario by the UN estimates a sea level increase of 12-17 inches in this century while he scares elementary school children and lectures the rest of us that it's at least 20 feet? Al rolled his eyes and grinned while not answering.

Inhofe asked Al since mankind's existence is on the line, why he hasn't adhered to the eco-demands he makes on the rest of us? Al could have pulled out a tutu while he spun a tale of non-denial denial. When asked to pledge that he would adhere to his eco-demands to prove to the world and little children that he really believes what he says, Al declined.

Inhofe then asked Al to explain America's estimated cost of $300 billion plus and about 4% of productivity per year to get started. Even the UN says that if all Kyoto Protocols are adopted worldwide, at a cost of trillions, the result will be a change of 7/100th of one degree Celsius in the world's temperature.

Al Gore and BillyBob Clinton left a shambles of the world and our economy as pardons were sold on their last days in power. So why would any reasonable and rational person believe that Al could identify a real problem and worse, suggest an adult solution? Al's skating on the Hill seems to answer that question in spades.

Is it the Message or is it the Truth?

Seems that science is rearing it's ugly head. This is the science we are told works by peer review that develops hard emotionless consensus. The science of facts and the science of reality. Then along comes Al. He's quoted today in a NY Times puff piece saying that "after 30 years of trying to communicate the dangers of global warming, “I think that I’m finally getting a little better at it.” A little better?

One of Al's biggest supporters is James E. Hansen, an environmental scientist, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. This is the very James E. Hansen that accused the Bush administration of restricting his global warming warnings. Yet truth is Mr. Hansen is a far left wing political activist that uses his position at NASA to promote his political views through Al Gore. Hanson says: "Al does an exceptionally good job of seeing the forest for the trees,” adding that Mr. Gore often did so “better than scientists.”

Truth is that credible scientists dispute every facet of Al's global warming hysteria. While the NY Times fronts their article with support for Al, they do still grit their teeth to ignore why Al flunked out of Harvard before earning a degree in religion. Seems to me that this surely prepared Al for his big government secular socialist religion's global warming program. And reading Al defenders surely seems that they too believe that this "Pope of global warming" is infallible. The Times agrees when they say: "Some backers concede minor inaccuracies (in Al's "Inconvenient Truth") but see them as reasonable for a politician. "

The biggest lie is of course about today's temperatures. Most Americans believe that our temperatures are the highest ever for planet earth. Truth is that temperatures are the highest since 1600 or so. Then the earth went into a mini-ice-age from which we are just now fully recovering. Al's patent dishonesty flies in the face of scientific facts.

“Nowhere does Mr. Gore tell his audience that all of the phenomena that he describes fall within the natural range of environmental change on our planet,” Robert M. Carter, a marine geologist at James Cook University in Australia, said in a September blog.

“Nor does he present any evidence that climate during the 20th century departed discernibly from its historical pattern of constant change.” Worse is that "in October, Dr. Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, made similar points at a geological society meeting in Philadelphia. He hotly disputed Mr. Gore’s claim that “our civilization has never experienced any environmental shift remotely similar to this” threatened change."

"Nonsense, Dr. Easterbrook told the crowded session. He flashed a slide that showed temperature trends for the past 15,000 years. It highlighted 10 large swings, including the medieval warm period. These shifts, he said, were up to “20 times greater than the warming in the past century.”

Truth is that secular socialists believe that mankind consumes too much and has too many choices and freedoms. This political movement began with the Bolsheviks and morphed into Fascists and today's secular socialists. Problem is that this minimalist political movement has been politically, democratically, economically, and militarily discredited. Today these same radical anti-human extremists have wrapped all of what they see is evil about personal freedoms and choices into eco-abuses which are so easily solved by global-warming-bullied solutions.

What gives me a bad feeling in the pit of my stomach is that the educated are so gullible. That so few have the intellectual curiosity to ask the tough questions. Maybe this is a values and morality issue after all. How can a group that feels racism can cure past racism; oppression solves problems; lying to promote good is OK; and bullying and oppressing those that have different opinions is fair and just; be trusted to vote and get elected and work in the government? They can't, Period!

Al "Earns" the Oscar for Docu-drama.

We can all rest this morning because Hollywood "dun da right tang" last night by shoveling the Documentary Feature Oscar to Al Gore over films that exposed world torture, abuses, self help successes, and other relevant topics. Thanks Al, for failing at everything in your life so that you can lead the world into the 19th century. Maybe we should call Al the the "First Amish President."

This brings to mind a Seattle Times enviro-story about Phillip Mote, a University of Washington climate wonk. The article says:

"Mote gives Gore's presentation, featured in the hit movie "An Inconvenient Truth," an A-minus on the science. He marks Gore down for claiming that global warming is behind shrinking snows on Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, for example, and for saying that changes in ocean currents could throw Europe into deep freeze.

But when he met Gore at a dinner in Seattle, Mote balked at telling Gore he disagreed with him. "It was just too intimidating for a nonconfrontational person like me," Mote said.

Say What? It's too intimidating to point out that Gore's docu-drama is based on zero science? That's it's based only on communist/socialist elitist thinking? It's too intimidating to point out to Gore that he needs to once in his life do the right thing?


.

Don't Ask and Don't Tell!

The pressure is off now that so-called scientists have crept to the 90% certainty threshold for man caused global warming. I can feel the warming air and see the clouds parting to shine the light of socialist propaganda on each and every American child, woman, and girlyman. Some bathe in this light because it gives them oppressive powers over others. And that's still what it's all about.

Today's Washington Post shines with an offer by Richard Branson to pay $25 million for discovery of a minimum tonnage method to cleanse the atmosphere of carbon dioxide. Branson shines standing next to Al, Bella-lugosi-the-Eco-vampire, Gore. Yes, the Al Gore that flunked out of government classes at Harvard, twice. Yes, the Al Gore that then sought a degree in religion because he couldn't pass any other class load. And yes, the Al Gore that once demanded a constitutional amendment in support of human creation at conception and now marches in parades celebrating the 10th million late third-term-abortion in the USA.

Better is that Al is slated for the Docu-drama Oscar and it's now said that the Swede's are talking about giving Al the Nobel Peace Prize much as last year's award to Jimmy, the communist and Jihadist, Carter. They gave it to Carter to teach President Bush a lesson about war and peace. And now they want to teach President Bush about climate change. Maybe we should rename Nobel's once relevant Peace Prize "The Political Attack Award." After all, these same dipwads gave Arafat, one of the world's most noted mass murderers, the very same award. There is poetic justice having Arafat, Carter, and Al, standing side by side. We then only need Fidel and Steven Spielberg to join this gang of intellects.

Pass the Drugs, Dude!

Seems that the United Nations operates at the speed of the world's slowest melting glacier except when Israel and the United States are being attacked. It took 10 years to hold Saddam accountable even though the UN then reversed itself. It's taken more than a dozen yeas to hold North Korea accountable or almost as long to discuss stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. There were the million dead in Rwanda while France fiddled with Clinton to stop intervention. Israelis die without a whimper from the UN but when a Palestinian is killed in retaliation for mass murder, the UN jumps to attack the innocent victims.

And so it's with the United States. Socialism and communism have gone the way of Dodo, but not at the UN. There the fight against America's successes and economic power is just getting ramped up. We're told that February 2nd, 2007, will be the date that will signal the beginning of a new world order and the end of America. This is the date that the world, aka UN, decided that America is the world's greatest villain because of our economy. In fact, 1,700 communists and socialists claim that we are killing the planet because we drive too many cars and watch too many flat panels.

The Washington Post's editorial today tells us that President Bush can no longer stand in the way of a world movement to save our planet.

Problem with this opinion is that President Bush has since 2001 reduced US emissions by all measures including tonnage, percentage, and efficiency more than any other administration or country.

Problem for the politicals is that our economy is solving emissions while government controls elsewhere are not.

Problem is, and that's why the UN is now hysterical about climate change, that the US economy adds another trillion dollars every two years or less.

While Kyoto might have stopped the US consumer society, today's political so called scientists know that each new trillion in economic output makes it much less likely that socialism and communism can be resurrected. As with Christianity, communists and socialists dream of their own religious resurrection. In fact, without a resurrection, they are "dead children walking."

.